|
No Choice but to Fight
by Yossi Klein Halevi
Yossi Klein Halevi, a
fellow at the Adelson Institute for Strategi Studies of the Shalem Center in
Jerusalem, is the author of “At the Entrance to the Garden of Eden: A Jew’s
Search for Hope with Christians and Muslims in the Holy Land.”
In May 1967, as a
14-year-old American Jew, I looked on helplessly as Egyptian President Gamal
Abdul Nasser moved his army to the Israeli border and promised the imminent
destruction of the “Zionist entity.”
I watched TV images of
demonstrators in Cairo and Damascus waving banners of skulls and crossbones.
The Jews were facing a second genocidal threat within two decades, yet the
international community seemed unmoved. I resolved that, if Israel survived,
I would someday make it my home.
Now, as an Israeli, I
find myself back in the nightmare of May 1967. If anything, Israel’s
survival seems even more precarious today. The Middle East conflict has been
transformed from a nationalist struggle over the creation of a Palestinian
state into an Islamist struggle against the existence of a Jewish state.
Terror enclaves aligned
with Iran – Hezbollah in the north, Hamas in the south – have formed on our
borders. For the first time since the 1948 war, the Israeli home front has
become the actual front.
Meanwhile, an Iranian
regime whose threats to destroy Israel have become so routine that they are
scarcely reported anymore may be about to cross the nuclear threshold. And
the notion that Israel’s very existence is a moral affront is spreading, not
only in Muslim countries but in the West.
I moved to Israel in
1982, shortly after the Israeli Army invaded Lebanon to expel Yasser
Arafat’s PLO forces. In the bitterly divided nation I had just joined, there
was little chance to savor the joy of homecoming. For the first time, many
Israelis were questioning the justness of their nation at war. The
apocalyptic images of May 1967 no longer seemed adequate to explain the
moral and political complexities of the conflict.
That self-doubt
intensified during the first intifada of the late 1980’s. I served in a
reserve unit patrolling Gaza’s refugee camps and became convinced we needed
to make almost any concession to end this pathological conflict. Concluding
that Israel was partly culpable came as a kind of relief: If we shared the
blame for the conflict, that meant we could help solve it.
I joined the growing
number of Israelis reaching out to the other side. In 1999, shortly before
the outbreak of the second intifada, I went on a year-long pilgrimage into
mosques and monasteries, seeking, as a religious Jew, a common devotional
language with my Muslim and Christian neighbors.
I didn’t expect
Palestinians to reciprocate. It’s always easier, after all, for the victor
to be more nuanced than the defeated. Still, I discovered that even as many
Israelis were trying to understand the Palestinian narrative, Palestinian
society was teaching its children that the Jewish narrative was a lie.
There was no ancient Jewish presence in the land of Israel, no Temple on the
Temple Mount, no Holocaust. One leading Palestinian moderate told me that
the Jews weren’t a people, only a religion, and that after the return of
Palestinian refugees to Israel, the Jews would resume their status as a
religious minority.
He was hardly alone:
The notion that the Jews aren’t a people and have no right to a state is
endemic throughout Palestinian society, in fact throughout the Arab world.
The Israeli left won
the debate over the need to end the occupation, but lost the debate over the
viability of peace.
Most Israelis today
want a two-state solution, but few believe it will end the conflict. Even
many who oppose settlement-building no longer believe that settlements are
the obstacle to peace.
Instead, we’ve become
convinced that the real obstacle remains the existence of a Jewish state in
any borders.
Since the collapse of
the Oslo peace process, Israel has been caught in one ongoing war. Though
the enemy repeatedly shifts, from Hamas to Hezbollah to Iran, the common aim
is jihad, and its target is civilian Israel.
The curse of Jewish
history – the inability to take mere existence for granted – has returned to
a country whose founding was intended to resolve that uncertainty.
We feel the impingement
of siege. In 1991, during the first Gulf War, when Tel Aviv was hit by Scud
missiles from Iraq, residents fled north to the Galilee. In 2006, when the
Galilee was hit by Katyushas from Hezbollah, residents fled south to Tel
Aviv. Now, the entire country is within missile range. Next time, there will
be nowhere to run.
After Israel’s failed
war against Hezbollah in 2006, we were haunted by the taunt of Hezbollah’s
leader, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, who claimed that Israel resembled a spider
web, seemingly formidable but easily dismantled.
Our ongoing inability
to prevent Hamas’ missile attacks against Israeli towns bordering Gaza
seemed to prove Nasrallah right. For eight years, successive Israeli
governments in effect abandoned hundreds of thousands of Israeli citizens.
The missiles continued to fall after Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, and
before Israel imposed its siege against Gaza’s Hamas government in 2007.
Their purpose was to terrorize, and they exposed Israeli helplessness.
The fear of losing our
ability to defend ourselves explains, in part, the motivation with which
Israeli soldiers fought during the recent war in Gaza. It explains too why
so many young Israelis, who came of age during the suicide bombings and
missile attacks, voted for right-wing parties in Israel’s recent election.
Meanwhile, we move from
one unresolved conflict to the next, finding ourselves increasingly isolated
and condemned. Yet we know we have no choice but to fight this war we tried
to avert. We know too that, this time, there will be no easy victory, no
Six-Day War to dispel the demons of May 1967.
-
The UN Partition Proposal
of 1947
Even though Transjordan
had been created as a homeland for “Palestinian Arabs”, the UN’s partition
plan of 1947 was accepted by Jews and refused by Arabs. The results? The War
of Independence which ended with Israel having more territory. Those who
would act on the assumption that peace will reign if Israel retreats, will
one day have to bear the responsibility for bringing a new war to the Middle
East by Arab aggression against Israel’s indefensible borders.
Nothing has changed:
recently a picture of the area showing a map of only “Palestine” on Israel’s
present territory was held in the hand of PA Pres. Mahmoud Abbas and printed
in PA daily newspapers. -
 |